Combining Heart Rate Variability Training and SLP COPD Treatment

Submitted by San Marcos Nursing & Rehab, San Marcos, TX

By now, many of us are aware of the benefits of using Heart Rate Variability Training (HRVT) with our patients: improved resilience, improved function, reduction in pain and increased therapeutic activity tolerance. At San Marcos Rehab, we have begun to integrate HRVT with a COPD protocol developed by Michele Scribner, SLP, at our affiliate Northeast Nursing and Rehab in San Antonio, Texas, which was based on the work of Jocelyn Alexander. We have seen some truly excellent outcomes as a result.

COPD patients often present with increased anxiety during completion of daily functional tasks and social interactions due to difficulty breathing. This labored breathing often results in increased blood pressure, coughing, fatigue and loss of appetite. This barrage of symptoms in COPD patients is often advanced enough that social isolation becomes a risk due to voice deficits and insufficient respiratory support for communication needs.

In the past, our focus for COPD patients was on compensatory breathing techniques, including pursed-lip breathing, diaphragmatic breathing, deep breathing and the huff-cough technique, followed by stretching/strengthening training. This protocol achieved positive results, with many patients decreasing the volume of supplemental O2 and some patients being completely weaned off supplemental O2. Additionally, many patients were able to incorporate the breathing techniques into their day-to-day routines, but some reported that the techniques “didn’t work” if they became short-of-breath and that it caused a spike in their anxiety, leading to rapid, shallow breathing and spiraling anxiety. To combat these spikes that sometimes occur, we incorporated HRVT in conjunction with the breathing techniques training, and this has led to improved overall outcomes.

Allowing the patient to be more centered and heart-engaged, while focusing on positive feelings, creates coherence.

Lois Ferguson and therapist Taylor Webb-Culver at San Marcos Nursing & Rehab, San Marcos, TX

Trained breathing techniques provided our patients with the tools necessary to short-circuit their anxiety when they started feeling short-of-breath. We typically have the patients use the pursed-lip and diaphragmatic breathing techniques during HRVT sessions. Meanwhile, we’ve found that the deep breathing with the hold technique and huff-cough technique actually interrupt attempts at achieving coherence.

Patients who have worked with our speech therapy team learning both HRVT and the COPD techniques report significantly decreased anxiety, improved communication abilities and increased activity tolerance upon discharge. Many have reported that they were independently able to use the techniques to control their anxiety when a SOB episode occurred. We even had a patient come back to visit our team so that she could show us that she taught her husband with COPD the techniques!

If you are currently using HRVT in your facility, I highly recommend incorporating this protocol into treatment regimens with your COPD residents.

No Anonymous Altered Textures!

By Lori O’Hara, MA, CCC-SLP, PDPM Resource

In general, altered textures and swallowing problems go hand in hand. While you will occasionally have a patient who wants mechanical soft because they don’t want to struggle with cutting meat, or a patient with severe dysphagia who is NPO, you should almost always see those things happening together.

In PDPM-land, this means that the case mixes that indicate “either” a swallowing component or a mechanically altered diet should be pretty darn rare (less than 10% of the total case mix distribution). For the curious types, those case mixes are SB, SE, SH and SK.

According to ASHA, as many as 45% of patients in nursing homes have swallowing problems, and in most cases those problems (at least in the early days) will be managed with some type of texture alteration.

Here are some tips to capture everything that goes along with those conditions:

  1. Any alteration to solid or liquid that is done with goal of making oral intake easier or safer is considered a mechanically altered diet.
  2. Section K swallowing impairment questions can be answered based on the SLP/OT interpreting clinical language in the therapy documentation – there does not need to be a word-for-word reflection of the MDS language in the therapy documentation to answer “yes” to a section K item.
  3. If the patient doesn’t need dysphagia treatment (typically because the condition is not new or expected to improve), a qualified clinician should always document the reason for the altered diet in a therapy or screening note.

Few patients choose altered textures for pleasure, so the underlying chewing or swallowing problem should be documented. This can include patient report (“I eat the mechanical soft diet because it’s too hard to chew meat” = pain or difficulty with swallowing) or documentation of subtle signs of swallowing impairment that are generally masked to the untrained eye by the altered texture itself. (Trace oral stasis or residue = holding food in mouth; throat clearing or wet voice after eating or drinking = coughing or choking during meals or medications).

SLPs’ Role in Fall Prevention

Submitted by Tamala Sammons, MA CCC-SLP, Senior Therapy Resource

Contributed from the American Speech and Hearing Association (ASHA.org)

https://www.asha.org/practice/reimbursement/medicare/medicare-patient-driven-payment-model/#Fall

Factors such as depression, hearing loss, medication management, cognitive impairments and poor sleep all impact a patient’s risk for falls as well as their ability to report them in a timely fashion. Good clinical practice dictates determining whether these risk factors play a role in the care of the patients in SNFs. Approximately 60% of older adults with cognitive impairment fall annually, almost two times more than their peers without a cognitive impairment (Eriksson, et al., 1993). Among individuals with dementia, fall frequency can even reach as high as 80% (Shaw et al, 2003). The high prevalence of falls among patients with dementia, despite relatively intact motor function, highlights the idea that falls are often not just a motor problem (Van Iersel, et al, 2006). Risk of persistently high expenditures for fall-related injuries among older Medicare community-dwelling fee-for-service beneficiaries is significantly higher for individuals with cognitive impairments, which leads to hospital/facility readmissions (Hoffman, et al., 2017).

SLPs can help detect cognitive impairment to identify older adults who are at higher risk for falling. Cognitive impairment can be a risk factor for falls and a barrier to safe/independent discharge to prior living environments consequent to the fall. SLPs have a critical role in assessing cognitive-communication and cognitive deficits in patients of all ages, including patients who have had a stroke, traumatic brain injury, or suffer from a neurodegenerative condition such as Parkinson’s disease, and all forms of dementia. Appropriate referrals can help SLPs design interventions so the patient can reduce their fall risk (e.g., designing memory aids and cues to help the individual follow safety precautions and self-regulate impulsive behaviors). Emerging evidence indicates that cognitive interventions have effects that carry over from the cognitive to the physical domain to enhance gait, and may reduce fall frequency (Segev-Jacubovski, et al, 2011).

The Importance of a Strong Partnership with Dietary

By Emily Clark, RD, Endura Nutrition Services Resource, & Tamala Sammons, MA CCC-SLP, Therapy Resource

Dietary and Therapy have a very meaningful partnership in our facilities. Communication between the two departments is critical. Here are a few areas where Dietary and Therapy can work together for patient success.

PDPM

It’s important to partner with the Dietary team when capturing information for section K on the MDS for the SLP Case Mix. Dietary and Therapy will work together to accurately assess for a swallow disorder and mechanically altered diets. Examples include: referring to SLP documentation to capture a swallow impairment in therapy notes during the seven-day look back when on a mechanically altered diet; referring to SLP documentation to assess for a swallow impairment if a patient is NPO; and clearly documenting needs for mechanically altered diets.

Diets

In addition to partnering with traditional modified diets, there is a new IDDSI diet classification system. Some facilities and vendors are moving toward changes per the IDDSI system. The new diets are also now available in PCC. Collaboration will be imperative when integrating any changes and training facility staff. A good partnership also helps when trialing new diet textures or new foods — having a good relationship and communication helps everyone get what is needed for the patient in a timely and efficient manner.

NPO

Partnering with Dietary is critical when Speech therapy is working with NPO patients and working toward transitioning back to oral diets. Dietitians will need to collaborate on continuous vs. bolus tube feedings; assessing percentage of oral intake vs. need for tube feeding; and when to safely discontinue tube feeding due to adequate oral intake.

Weight Loss

Weight has emerged as a principal screening and monitoring indicator in post-acute and long-term care. It is easy to measure, and the measurement is reasonably accurate and reproducible, noninvasive and acceptable to most patients. Dietitians are great partners as they track and trend weight loss. Rehab teams need to review this information to determine if interventions are warranted. For example, is there a swallowing issue? Is there a need for supplements? Is there a need for need for adaptive equipment? Could more physical activity help? SLPs may also be able to help contribute to interventions as they see what foods the patient likes and does well with, or more about their eating patterns.

Self-Feeding

Loss of ability to self-feed can impact a patient’s overall oral intake and diminish the quality of life. Partnering with Dietary to determine if adaptive equipment is needed is a great way to help residents. Additionally, Therapy needs to assess how meals are served — for example, small portions, individual bowls at a time, etc.

Dehydration

It is important to partner with Clinical and Dietary to determine which patients are dehydrated and/or at risk for dehydration. Speech can assess for swallow impairments and/or refusals of thickened liquids. Speech Therapy can assess appropriate patients for Free Water Protocols. Occupational Therapy can assess for self-feeding and potential needs for adaptive cups. All disciplines can offer their patients hydration during therapy sessions. Therapy can also help participate in facility-wide hydration breaks for the residents.

Wound Care

Partnering with Dietary is essential when addressing wound care. Both Dietary and all Therapy disciplines review labs to determine patients’ protein levels, as well as review meal intake to determine if patients are consuming adequate nutrition and hydration for wound healing.

Dementia

Patients with dementia often lack awareness of the need for eating and may have difficulty sensing hunger and thirst. As the disease progresses, patients become unable to recognize foods, have difficulty remembering social dining skills and have short attention spans, which affects their ability to sit long enough to complete a meal. Therapy and Dietary can partner to assess dining room setup. For example, provide smaller dining areas to remind patients of home, arrange seating to enhance the meal experience, determine food preferences and dietary needs, and match the food items and food presentation to a patient’s current abilities (finger foods, certain utensils, etc.) in order to eliminate a source of potential frustration at meal times.

From Therapist to Executive Director: The Why and the How

By Chad Long, Therapy Resource

Post-acute health care is making a massive shift this October with Medicare’s change to the Patient Driven Payment Model (PDPM), where patient clinical characteristics drive the reimbursement and functional outcomes determine success.

Along with the payment model changing, we are in the midst of a significant population shift (often referred to as the Silver Tsunami) in which we have a growing number of older people, many of whom need a greater number of health care services.

“The Silver Tsunami is already rolling in and projections from the U.S. Census Bureau point to 2030 as a milestone year in which older people will actually outnumber children for the first time in history.” Tom Sullivan, March 15, 2019

https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/silver-tsunami-coming-healthcare-time-prepare

“As the number of senior people rises in many economies of the world, the need for long-term care and aging-in-place services will increase.” Reenita Das, Aug 11, 2015

https://www.forbes.com/sites/reenitadas/2015/08/11/a-silver-tsunami-invades-the-health-of-nations/#494f73d53efd

So who will help champion the changes in health care delivery and ensure clinical and operational success in Post-Acute? Why not Therapy Professionals?! As licensed therapists and therapy assistants, we have a unique opportunity to move into Skilled Nursing Operations (Nursing Home Administrators, Executive Directors, CEOs, etc.) and work in a new capacity within the Interdisciplinary Team.

Within the Ensign Affiliated Facilities, we are seeing a growing number of Directors of Rehab moving into Operations and having great success. So why would therapy professionals be good candidates for Administrators in Training and, eventually, Executive Directors? At a recent Service Center meeting, led by Spencer Burton, a few reasons were discussed:

Why DOR to ED:

  • Clinical backgrounds
  • Mini-business leader (HR, Compliance, Billing, Maintenance, etc.)
  • Balance of clinical and financial
  • Multipliers
  • Vision -> Path: Perspective — Push to goals
  • Teaching, coaching, developing people
  • Creative
  • Likeable
  • Challengers
  • Communication skills
  • Well-versed in Ensign culture

Guess who is a Therapist and Facility Operator?

  • Salma Moore: Arroyo Vista
  • Ryan Goldbarg: Victoria Ventura
  • Matt Scott: Mission Hills
  • Brian Rupert: Villas at Sunny Acres
  • Doug Haney: Bella Vita
  • Amy Guiterrez: La Hacienda
  • Ediel Barrera: McAllen Transitional
  • Marissa Parker: Legacy
  • Kyle Martin: Kirkwood
  • Kumar Pradeep: South San Antonio
  • Amber Thompson: New Braunfels
  • Travis Jones: Cornerstone

So what are the requirements to become a Licensed Nursing Home Administrator? Well, that depends on the state in which you live. However, there are a few common requirements. Typically, you must be 19 to 21 years of age, have a bachelor’s degree, complete an Administrator in Training Program (or have a master’s degree in a health-care-related field) and successfully pass the National and State Nursing Home Administrator Exam. Below is a list of basic requirements, per state, and a link to the National Association of Long Term Care Administrators Boards.

If you are interested in growing in a different career path from therapy to more facility operations, please contact Jamie Funk at JFunk@EnsignServices.net, or talk with your facility administrator. Let’s be the change we want to see in our organizations and in health care!

Can Heart Rate Variability Be Improved in Those with Heart Failure Through Gratitude Journaling?

By Cory Robertson, PT, DPT, Therapy Resource

According to a study out of the University of California, San Diego, the answer is no, and yes. How can that be, you ask? Keep reading to get the details and the findings of the study: A pilot randomized study of gratitude journaling intervention on HRV and inflammatory biomarkers in Stage B heart failure patients.

Patients with Stage B heart failure are those who have a structural abnormality of the heart but have not yet developed symptoms. Thus this stage is a therapeutic window of opportunity to deliver interventions to prevent the progression of the disease and to maintain quality of life.

Studies suggest a strong connection between gratitude and well-being. The area of behavioral cardiology is increasing focus on positive psychology like gratitude and how it affects physical health. More studies are needed using objective measures of physical health to understand the disease-buffering effects of gratitude. One of those objective measures studied in this paper is heart rate variability (HRV). As we know, HRV is a measure to quantitatively assess variation in heartbeat intervals that is often used to detect changes in the autonomic nervous system. Psychological factors like mood, satisfaction, depression and chronic stress are related to the autonomic nervous system, suggests the research. So can gratitude journaling improve HRV?

Seventy patients with Stage B HF were randomized into two groups: a gratitude journaling group, and a “treatment as usual” group for a period of eight weeks. Participants were assessed at pre-, mid- and post-intervention for inflammatory biomarkers from a blood draw, basal HRV data obtained, as well given a gratitude and exercise activities questionnaire.

After eight weeks, these data were re-acquired; also, both groups were assessed for HRV responses to a specific gratitude journaling task. Here is the wording of the journaling instructions, and if you’re like me, just reading the instructions summons a sense of well-being: “For the next eight weeks, you will be asked to record three to five things for which you are grateful on a daily basis. Think back over your day and include anything, however small or great, that was a source of gratitude that day. Make the list personal and try to think of different things each day.”

Basal HRV measures between groups after eight weeks showed no significant differences — though at the eight-week assessment during the specific journaling task, there were medium to large effect sizes between the groups’ HRV. So assessing the different groups’ HRV separate from the act of gratitude showed no difference, but during a gratitude task, there was a significant difference. The authors surmise that “increases in parasympathetic cardiac tone … [during] journaling may reflect state changes that occur while contemplating items or feelings of gratitude during daily life.” Moreover, the gratitude journaling group had a significant reduction in inflammatory biomarkers, which are related to morbidity and mortality in patients with HF.

I’m grateful for this research and for the opportunities to learn more about the heart and how I can do something to help my heart function. Do you think reading research regarding gratitude and its benefits also improves HRV?

 

LSVT Live in Colorado

By Maryann Bowles, Therapy Resource — Colorado

The ENDURA Market in Colorado gathered 10 of their physical and occupational therapists to complete their LSVT BIG live training together at the Villas at Sunny Acres. The group spent a full day going through treatment and practice of the evidence-based neurologic patterns and movements for the treatment of symptoms associated with Parkinson’s disease.

Specifically, research shows that LSVT BIG treatment can lead to faster walking with bigger steps and arm swings, better balance and more ability to twist at the waist. Clinicians also report that LSVT BIG often helps people with buttoning their clothes, writing and other smaller-movement (“small motor”) tasks, as well as large (“large motor”) movements like dressing, getting up from a seat and getting into bed.

Because PD makes it harder to remember to use these bigger movements consistently, treatment includes a lot of repetition and progressive challenges, as well as daily home practice and assignments for using bigger movements in everyday life.

Ultimately, LSVT BIG helps improve the mismatch between what you feel you’re doing and what you’re actually doing, making you more confident, comfortable and empowered. With one month of hard work, LSVT BIG can open doors to a more active and independent life.

The ENDURA market therapist will now have a local network of fellow therapists to help support their development of a strong Parkinson’s and movement disorder treatment program in their buildings.

Using Occupational Profiles to help with Trauma-Informed Care

By Tamala Sammons, MA CCC-SLP , Senior Therapy Resource

We have become aware of Requirements for Participation, or ROPs. An area that we might not think about from a rehab perspective is the new Phase 3 requirement of trauma-informed care. This requirement is part of Quality of care: 483.25 Quality of care.

Trauma-informed care: Trauma survivors must receive culturally-competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice, accounting for residents’ experiences and preferences to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization.

Currently, trauma is defined as singular or cumulative experiences that result in adverse effects on functioning and mental, physical, emotional or spiritual well-being. Trauma contributes to mental health and functional difficulties. Individuals with multiple adverse experiences are more likely to engage in health-risk behaviors and are more likely to be obese, and have higher rates of heart disease, stroke, liver disease, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and autoimmune disorders than the general population (Oral et al., 2016).

There are five primary principles for trauma-informed care.

  • This includes creating spaces where people feel culturally, emotionally and physically safe as well as an awareness of an individual’s discomfort or unease
  • Transparency and trustworthiness
  • Choice
  • Collaboration and mutuality
  • Empowerment

It is important for us to be aware of any adverse experiences our patients may have encountered and awareness of any triggers so we can work with them in an environment where they feel safe, can make choices and are empowered with their plan of care.

Our Occupational Therapists are essential partners as they can complete an occupational profile as part of their evaluation. According to AOTA, “The occupational profile is a summary of a client’s occupational history and experiences, patterns of daily living, interests, values and needs. The information is obtained from the client’s perspective through both formal interview techniques and casual conversation and leads to an individualized, client-centered approach to intervention.” The profile demonstrates occupational therapy practitioners’ commitment to clients as collaborators in the occupational therapy process and facilitates client-centered practice.

A copy of an occupational profile can be found on AOTA’s site: https://www.aota.org/~/media/Corporate/Files/Practice/Manage/Documentation/AOTA-Occupational-Profile-Template.pdf

Additionally, taking time to obtain the occupational profile is essential to allow care providers to deeply connect and align with the principles of trauma-informed care. Occupational profiles allow therapists to build trust, collaborate with and empower clients, and get to personal issues that are unique to each person they work with.

Occupational therapists are not expected to do this alone, however, as trauma-informed care is an IDT approach. Even though standard occupational therapy interventions that focus on improving function, well-being and health can support individuals with intensive needs, it is essential that practitioners know the limits of their personal knowledge and skills and be ready to refer when needed by maintaining collaborative relationships with colleagues who have advanced trauma-specific skills. Sharing this information with the IDT will help with effective care planning strategies, especially if that means bringing in other professionals to help.

Additional Resources

  • For a complete description of each component and examples of each, refer to the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process, 3rd Edition.
  • American Occupational Therapy Association (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.).
  • American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, S1–S48. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.682006
  • aota.org

What is IDDSI?

By Elyse Matson, MA CCC-SLP, SLP Therapy Resource

IDDSI stands for International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative. The purpose of the initiative was to create standards across all environments so that the foods and liquids have the same texture or viscosity.

For example, when a patient arrives to your facility on nectar liquids, how do we determine if the hospital’s version of nectar is the same as ours?

The IDDSI framework consists of a continuum of 8 levels (0-7), where drinks are measured from Levels 0–4, while foods are measured from Levels 3–7.

There are specific testing methods to determine the levels, including a flow test with use of a 10 ml syringe and a fork test to determine food particle size and food softness.

Implementation

So should you implement IDDSI at your facility? There are several factors to consider. The first is, who is your menu vendor? The vendor supplies the menus to the kitchen and provides instructions/wording on which diets your facility uses and how to prepare the meals. It is up to this vendor to adopt IDDSI and provide the new language/instructions to the kitchen.

The next question is whether your local hospitals/referral sources are adopting IDDSI. This may create a need to address the diets sooner rather than later. We have created a conversion chart below to provide to your admitting nurses so they can convert the IDDSI diets back to your current diets.

Finally, you will need to work closely with your SLP, Dietary Department and IDT to determine if your facility is ready for this change. For further questions, please go to www.iddsi.org or reach out to Elyse Matson, SLP Resource (ematson@ensignservices.net).

PDPM Corner: ARDs and Section GGs

By Lori O’Hara, MA, CCC-SLP, Therapy Resource ADR/Appeals/Clinical Review

Setting the ARD

The purpose of the lookback period is to capture those conditions and characteristics that impact the patient’s treatment plan in such a way that they can 1) be reported to oversight agencies and 2) calculate a reimbursement rate.

Under PDPM, since the whole premise of the rate is that it is commensurate with how complex the patient is, it’s then essential that the lookback period capture as many of those things as possible. And it may be that capturing hospital activity is important!

If a patient received IV hydration or nutrition while in the hospital, it can impact our Nursing case mix. This makes sense — patients who were dependent on an enteral delivery of fluid or calories are quite fragile in the period after this treatment concludes. The lookback on this item is seven days and includes delivery while in the hospital.

So the IDT’s job is to decide what the right ARD is to capture all the important info. We may choose to set the ARD on day one, knowing that capturing the hospital intervention paints the most accurate picture of the patient’s complexity. Or, if an IV medication starts after admission on day 7, that might be the right date for a lookback to capture the clinical picture. Or, if the patient had fluids through the day of discharge and has wound treatments ordered on day five, then a lookback that captures part of the hospital activity and part of the post-admission activity may be what’s best.

The good news is that up through day eight, the ARD can be moved forward and backward as needed to make sure that we’ve captured all the complexities of the patient we’re taking care of.

Section GG Reconciliation

Mythbuster time! Therapy should not be the only source of data for Section GG. One of the sources, sure! But not the only one.

Data sources should include therapy evaluations, nursing documentation and the MDS Coordinator’s observation of CNA care. All of this data should be recorded in the record, and then the IDT’s job is to reconcile this through the Section GG UDA.

So what does “reconciliation” mean? It means looking at all the available data and deciding what really represents the “usual and baseline” performance through analysis and discussion.

Say you’re looking at toilet transfers. The Occupational Therapy evaluation says Mod Assist, the nurses’ notes say Partial/Moderate Assistance, and the MDS Nurse documents Partial/Moderate Assistance in her entry. Then Partial/Moderate Assistance seems like the perfect answer.

But what if the OT says Moderate Assist, one nursing entry says Moderate/Partial but one says Substantial/Maximal — and the MDS Coordinator’s note also says Substantial/Maximal? What’s the right answer?

That’s the reconciliation part. And there’s no CMS mandated formula — it’s your IDT looking at the data and the overall performance of the patient and deciding. Do you suspect the patient performs a little more independently with therapy, but that really they’re requiring more help? Then landing on the more dependent score is probably the right answer. Do you know that later in the day they become a lot heavier? Then again, their usual performance is probably the more dependent one.

The critical element is having as much data as you can (and sometimes that will be a very small amount, if therapy is starting the day of admission!) and making a reasoned decision based on the information you have. You want to be able to point to the data you had available and your IDT’s decision-making process to support your coding should you need to defend it later.